[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: base
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: base |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:06:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> Well, when things get broken, you need a technician to fix them. Most
> users aren't technicians. Projects shouldn't choose tools that become
> broken or could break the project to the degree that most users
> couldn't fix without calling a technician.
The real problem are tools that can break the project to the degree that
it becomes scary to impossible to fix even for technicians.
One thing I like about git is that you can always literally do
git reset --hard '@{one hour ago}'
As long as you have not pushed anything. But why would you when things
go horribly wrong?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: base, (continued)
- Re: base, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Leo, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/27
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/27
- Re: base,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/27
- Re: base, Leo, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Teemu Likonen, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/24