[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:39:05 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> If committing configure alone is all we need to avoid the problem, we
> could decide to do that, philosophical and atom-splitting issues
> notwithstanding.
No, I'm saying that the design of bzr doesn't permit that.
> Alternatively, "bzr revert configure" before committing the merges
> should also do.
As long as the Makefile knows to update configure, you're OK until
somebody with a different version of autoconf reports a bug. Or
somebody with *no* autoconf decides to build, and gets stopped before
they get started even though they've got a perfectly good configure.
- Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/09
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Glenn Morris, 2010/11/09
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/10
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/10
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/10
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/11
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/11
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/11
Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/10
Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/10
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Glenn Morris, 2010/11/10
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Glenn Morris, 2010/11/10
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Chad Brown, 2010/11/10
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/10
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Kenichi Handa, 2010/11/11
- Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk, Glenn Morris, 2010/11/11