[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:35:04 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > But, as I wrote before, I'm still hesitating over which is
> > better; keeping glyphless-char-display separate from display
> > table, or integrating that functionality to display table.
> What are the pros and cons, which make you hesitate?
Both glyphless-char-display and display table control the
displaying of each character. I think such a control should
be done by a single mechanism. At least it will benefit
users in a long run.
But, the biggest concern is about the backward
compatibility. Currently, a display table element is nil or
vector of characters. If there's a code that assumes that a
non-nil element is a vector of characters, it will be
broken. Next, a display table is not inherited. So, if
buffer-display-table or a window-specific display is set,
standard-display-table is not looked up. At last, there are
several standard-display-XXX functions
(e.g. standard-display-8bit). At the moment, I don't know
how to make the functionality of
glyphless-char-display-control go with them.
> > I agree on exempting TAB and NL from c0-control group.
> Done.
Thank you.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, (continued)
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/17
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/26
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Kenichi Handa, 2010/11/26
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/27
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/29
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/20
- Prev by Date:
Re: improve rmail's MIME handling
- Next by Date:
Re: improve rmail's MIME handling
- Previous by thread:
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
- Next by thread:
Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
- Index(es):