[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:38:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:20:37 -0400 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
SM> I know, but I don't think there's any fundamental good reason why we
SM> can't tweak emacs/lisp/Makefile.in so that it gets things to work.
>> They are packages, that's a great reason :) Yeah, you can do it, but
>> it's going to break sooner or later. I like Chong's approach better
>> than tweaking things.
>> Also, isn't it better to put the rules inside the GNU ELPA (thus the
>> "elpa" branch) than inside Emacs' lisp/Makefile.in, as Chong suggested?
SM> Where they go doesn't matter much, yes.. The important part is to be
SM> able to use them in-place and have them all activated from a single
SM> place with "bzr up; make".
OK. So who's going to do the work? And can you summarize what you're
asking for after this discussion?
Ted
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, (continued)
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/25
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/25
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/25
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/25
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/29
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/29
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/30
- Re: Keeping an ELPA checkout, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/30