Re: New build process?

[Tim Cross]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> Tim Cross <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Tim Cross <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> a typo - their quite common you know. Context usually helps to
>>>> recognize them. In this case, autogen is probably the most likely
>>>> candidate :)
>>>
>>> What has autogen to do with emacs?
>>>
>>
>> autogen.sh then if you must be pedantic about it,
>
> You wrote: "Previously, you ran autoget and now you run ./autogen.sh"
> (with typo fixed), now you claim: "Previously, you ran autogen.sh and
> now you run ./autogen.sh".
>
> That does not make sense to me.

You left no context before, so I had no idea what you were getting at.
As you will see in my reply to Eli, I was mistaken in my recollection.
However, now you have provided the context rather than just a word, I
can say that autoget should have been autoconf.

Tim