[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:28:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
>> No, what I was asking is what happens if I do want to bind alt-R? I
>> think this was answered in another post i.e. you have to 'undo' the
>> key translation first.
> That's false. Just try it. I tried this:
> M-x global-set-key RET
> Alt-R
> ignore RET
> After that, "C-h c Alt-R" says
> ® (translated from A-R) runs the command ignore
But then if you have some other key that generates ®, it will also be
rebound to `ignore' since you have really just done
(global-set-key [?®] 'ignore)
I think these Alt bindings should either be removed, or turned into
function-key-map bindings (so they don't take precedence over real key
bindings).
Also we should address the problem that those key-bindings are only
present after loading iso-transl.el.
Stefan
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, (continued)
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Tim Cross, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/27
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/26
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26