[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Apr 2012 23:10:20 +0200 |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 22:01, <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bzr is okay for most things, except it lacks co-located branches
>From the 2.5.0 announcement: "The 2.5 series provides a faster smart
protocol implementation for many operations, basic support for
colocated branches."
So it's almost there.
Juanma
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, (continued)
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Jason Rumney, 2012/04/16
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/16
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Christophe Poncy, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Christophe Poncy, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Bastien, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Bastien, 2012/04/09