[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
John Yates |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:32:19 -0400 |
I am surprised no one has mentioned in this thread the parade of
erstwhile bzr developers (including Martin Pool) who have admitted on
the bzr mailing list that they have abandoned the project and why.
Richard, can I assume that you are familiar with at least some of
these posting?
/john
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> The point is, I am trying to determine whether Bzr is effectively
>> maintained or not.
>
> The answer to that question should be obvious by looking at the public
> repository and developers' list. Perhaps they are maintaing it
> internally, or perhaps they intend to maintain it again in the (near
> or not-so-near) future. But right now, and for quite a while, the
> answer to "is effectively maintained?" cannot be other than "not".
>
> J
>
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Thierry Volpiatto, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Allen S. Rout, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
John Yates <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Leo Liu, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, joakim, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Karl Fogel, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Karl Fogel, 2013/03/29