Re: filenotify.el

[Davis Herring]

>> As said, I don't care too much whether we keep file-notify-supported-p.
>> Your decision ...
> 
> I think we should try to live without it.  If/when it proves
> necessary/useful, we can re-add it.

An addendum to my own agitation: if there's a way to prevent gfilenotify
from polling (or if we add Lisp polling to filenotify.el in the future),
`file-notify-add-watch' could benefit from a don't-poll flag, either as
an additional argument or as a new accepted symbol in FLAGS.  That way
we can (probably) also avoid having a
`file-notify-supported-without-polling-p'.

Davis

-- 
This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.