[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr] |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:28:16 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:13:50 +0100
> From: Per Starbäck <address@hidden>
> Cc: David Kastrup <address@hidden>, "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
>
> Richard wrote:
>
> > Emacs is never going to be as easy to learn as simple
> > editors, because ease of learning is not its priority.
> > The priority is effective editing for people willing to learn.
> > We won't sacrifice that goal for ease of learning.
>
> I find this remark about "simple editors" interesting, not just in
> terms of Emacs, but of the whole GNU system. I have always thought
> of GNU Emacs as *the* editor in GNU, that is the default editor. Do
> you think a GNU system ideally instead should have some other
> ("simple") editor as the default editor?
That's not what Richard was saying, not at all. There could very well
be a "simple" editor that is part of the GNU project (perhaps there is
one already). No one said the GNU project must have only one editor.
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), (continued)
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Richard Stallman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr],
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr], Sivaram Neelakantan, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), David Kastrup, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Sven Axelsson, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), Tom, 2014/01/18
- Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?), chad, 2014/01/18