Re: clang vs free software

[Lennart Borgman]

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:35 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>wrote:
>
>> > We don't want to make a program's entire AST available for parsing
>> > because that would make it easy to extend GCC with proprietary
>> > programs.
>>
>> Let me just say that even tho I understand and agree with the goal,
>> I disagree.
>>

>> +1

I am glad I don't have Richard's totally ungrateful job, but then he
picked it himself.

I think you are misinterpreting goal vs policies. The comment is in line with the long term goal.