Re: Git transition workflow

[Eric S. Raymond]

Stephen J. Turnbull <address@hidden>:
> Paul Michael Reilly writes:
> 
>  > Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal
>  > with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc?
> 
> Having observed several of these transitions, including Emacs's
> CVS->Bazaar transition, it's really not a problem as long as the git
> fans accept that several major contributors just want a CVS-like
> workflow, and git commands that implement that workflow are explained
> in straightforward terms.

Furthermore, the workflow documentation is already up on the wiki.
That's one of the first things I did.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>