[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_S
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings] |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:35:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
> To address Stefan's concern about alloca-allocated thingies escaping to
> Elisp, is there some way you can include a runtime test for that, when
> checking is enabled? It wouldn't have to catch every escapee, just a high
> percentage of them.
I'd expect that such escaping would only occur in "unusual setups", as
a result of later unrelated changes. E.g. an alloca_string object is
passed to DECODE_FILE or to Fexpand_file_name, which will usually stay
within C code or even if it escapes to Elisp its lifetime will not
escape the stack discipline.
And some times later we get random crashes in odd situations because
someone figure a clever way to do god-knows-what (e.g. speed things up
via a memoization) by storing those refs into some global table.
Basically, this risks making Elisp's semantics more murky, so it has to
come with a good performance story.
Stefan
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], (continued)
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/04
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/04
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/04
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Paul Eggert, 2014/09/04
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/05
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/05
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/05
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Paul Eggert, 2014/09/05
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/05
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Paul Eggert, 2014/09/05
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings],
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/08
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/08
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/08
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/08
- Re: Benchmarking temporary Lisp objects [Was: Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings], Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/08
Re: [RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings, Paul Eggert, 2014/09/02
[RFC] temporary Lisp_Strings, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/09/02