Re: resolving ambiguity in action stamps

[David Kastrup]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:

> Eric S. Raymond writes:
>
>  > One is a genuinely funny gotcha.  You can't get to git hashes
>  > without going through something semantically like my version stamps
>  > on the way!
>
> I disagree.  "Think hard" (your words!) about the workflow:
>
>     Find a bug and make it work
>     Then just "git blame" will find the jerk!

After fixing a bug, "git blame" tends to point to the bug fixer.
Depending on who wrote that couplet for whom, this may actually be the
intended meaning.

-- 
David Kastrup