[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package.el dependencies
|
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
|
Subject: |
Re: package.el dependencies |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:35:02 -0200 |
>> Why not use the package-desc getters?
>
> Because package-desc-reqs returns only the direct dependencies of a
> package, we have to check all dependencies, for example the package
> "jedi" have 3 direct dependencies and 4 indirect dependencies (or may be 4
> and 3).
I think we had a failure in communication here. What I meant was: "Why
not use `(package-desc-name pkg)' instead of `(elt pkg 1)'?
- Re: package.el dependencies, (continued)
Re: package.el dependencies, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/01/25
Re: package.el dependencies, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/25
Re: package.el dependencies, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/01/25
Re: package.el dependencies,
Artur Malabarba <=
Re: package.el dependencies, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/26
Re: package.el dependencies, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/01/26
Re: package.el dependencies, Artur Malabarba, 2015/01/26
Re: package.el dependencies, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/01/28