Re: EWOULDBLOCK and EINPROGRESS in process.c

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:42:00 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> 
> The EWOULDBLOCK code is there because Kim Storm heard a rumor that some 
> oddball 
> nonblocking 'connect' implementations returned EWOULDBLOCK.  Please see:
> 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2002-02/msg00718.html
> 
> I also vaguely recall stories that some old Unix platforms did that.  The 
> most 
> recent reference I found in a quick Google search was UnixWare 7 Release 
> 7.1.4 
> (April 2004):
> 
> http://uw714doc.sco.com/en/SDK_netapi/sockC.nonBlockSocks.html
> 
> If that documentation is right, the current Emacs code wouldn't work on 
> UnixWare 
> 7.1.4, not that we care.

Thanks for the references.