[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs author stats
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs author stats |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:49:34 +0100 |
You're right that attracting huge droves of developers didn’t happen,
and it's always nice to see numbers and data, but 5 months is not a
very relevant sample here for the purpose of finding an
upward/downward pattern.
Note how much the number has fluctuated over the last 4 years, the
range of some flucuations is as large as the average value.
We'd need to wait another year, and probably average over every 2 or 3
months, in order to see any patterns.
Also, I think number of committers would be a more relevant metric,
altough this number would be even smaller and less reliable.
2015-04-23 18:41 GMT+01:00 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>:
> I wondered whether switching to git had any effect, developer wise, so I
> whipped up some stats:
>
> http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2015/04/23/the-effect-of-version-control-systems-on-emacs-developers/
>
> The Emacs Lisp functions I wrote to make the stats are on github (linked
> from the article), so feel free to fix the data if my methodology is
> unsound. :-)
>
> --
> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
> bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
>
>
>
- Re: Emacs author stats, (continued)
- Re: Emacs author stats, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Peder O. Klingenberg, 2015/04/24
- Re: Emacs author stats, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/24
- Re: Emacs author stats, chad, 2015/04/23
- Re: Emacs author stats, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/23
Re: Emacs author stats,
Artur Malabarba <=