Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el

[Stefan Monnier]

>> And if a project implementation has to provide its own implementation,
>> it's much cleaner, I think, if it only has to deal with
>> project-search-path-function, instead of being forced to
>> cl-call-next-method.
> Well, that's my question. I don't see that as "cleaner"; I much prefer
> object dispatching to random funcalls.

Currently, project-search-path-function takes no argument, so there's
not much on which to dispatch.


        Stefan