[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future role of ELPA
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: Future role of ELPA |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:26:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Reichör <address@hidden> writes:
> 2. The packages should not be too fine grained. It is not very useful to
> split e.g. tramp in 20 sub-packages for example.
Don't fear this, I'm not going this way. tramp-theme.el has just stolen
the name from Tramp because it is a brand. It does not depend on Tramp
itself, and it cooperates with any other file name handler which offers
file-remote-p functionality.
> Stefan.
Best regards, Michael.
- Re: Future role of ELPA, (continued)
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Christian Kruse, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Michael Albinus, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Christian Kruse, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Michael Albinus, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Christian Kruse, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Oleh Krehel, 2016/02/16
- RE: Future role of ELPA (was: [ELPA] tramp-theme.el), Drew Adams, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, John Wiegley, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Stefan Reichör, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA,
Michael Albinus <=
- Re: Future role of ELPA, John Wiegley, 2016/02/16
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/17
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/20
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Philipp Stephani, 2016/02/21
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/21
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/21
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/22
- Re: Future role of ELPA, Phillip Lord, 2016/02/17
- Re: [ELPA] tramp-theme.el, Alexis, 2016/02/16
- Re: [ELPA] tramp-theme.el, Joost Kremers, 2016/02/16