[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:56:16 +0200 |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:48:46 -0800
>
> It should be fairly easy to add an option to 'configure'. Something like
> this, say:
>
> ./configure --disable-lib-src=ctags
>
> where the option argument specifies which lib-src programs to build. Is
> that something you'd like to develop?
Maybe we should even make that the default? Does anyone still use the
ctags that is distributed with Emacs?
- Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Kaushal Modi, 2016/03/09
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/09
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Paul Eggert, 2016/03/09
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Ulrich Mueller, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Kaushal Modi, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Ulrich Mueller, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/10