[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why was iso-acc.el removed from master?
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: why was iso-acc.el removed from master? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:28:41 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.92 (darwin) |
>>>>> Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
> That is one of the reasons for me to hang around here: to catch up such
> discussions, but I must have missed it. Do you remember when it was
> approximately?
Sure, it was here, and happened in January 2016:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/198007
> In case there are not and I would agree to be the maintainer, I then have to
> sign FSF copyright? Could I do that by email (scanned signed document)?
Yes, simply send an e-mail to address@hidden, and they'll get you started on
the process.
> BTW since we are now in the 21 century, is there any change that one could
> simply signed these papers by a pgp/smime key or are US courts not that
> modern :'(
You can ask about more efficient processes from the FSF at the above e-mail
address; I'm not sure exactly what liberties they can allow. It's hard to
rely on a PGP key that you haven't verified either in person, or through a
highly trusted chain of signatures.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- Re: why was iso-acc.el removed from master?, (continued)
Re: why was iso-acc.el removed from master?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
Re: why was iso-acc.el removed from master?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
Re: why was iso-acc.el removed from master?, John Wiegley, 2016/03/10