[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Redisplay hook
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Redisplay hook |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jul 2016 05:42:25 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:09:59 -0400
>
> > It is asking for trouble, since if there is any bug in it or confusing
> > behavior, you will get totally screwed.
>
> Much more than with a pre- or post-command-hook?
Yes, because those ones run outside of redisplay.
> We could have the same logic for errors:
>
> If an unhandled error happens in running this hook,
> the function in which the error occurred is unconditionally removed, since
> otherwise the error might happen repeatedly and make Emacs nonfunctional.
If we go this way, that's probably a good thing to do.
- Re: Redisplay hook, (continued)
- RE: Redisplay hook, Drew Adams, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, raman, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Richard Stallman, 2016/07/05
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/05
Re: Redisplay hook, Richard Stallman, 2016/07/03
Re: Redisplay hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/07/03
Re: Redisplay hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/03
Re: Redisplay hook, Andreas Schwab, 2016/07/04
Re: Redisplay hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/04