[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:04:48 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> "Should", not "will". And on some systems, only with very recent
> library versions.
Again: which system are you think of that's had a buggy
malloc-with-threads in the last, say, ten years?
Stefan
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, (continued)
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03