[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:07:08 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> >Github actively encourages users to specify the license. (Yes, they
> >suggest free software as well as open source licenses.)
> There's a difference?
Yes, there is a practical difference.
> If you're thinking that "free software" == "copyleft" and "open
> source" == "non-copyleft", that's actually not the case. For
> example, the GPL is both a free software and an open source
> license, and the same is true of (say) the MIT license.
That is correct. However, there is a between open source licenses and
free licenses -- in a different area. A few open source programs use
licenses which are too restrictive to qualify as free.
Fortunately the number of those programs seems to be small.
I think that over 99% of all open source source programs are free.
https://gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html gives
a full explanation.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, (continued)
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/30
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/30
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/28
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/28
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/28
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/28
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Karl Fogel, 2017/07/28
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/30
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/17
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/28
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/30
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/31
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/31