Re: [PATCH] timer-list -> list-timers?

[Mark Oteiza]

address@hidden (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo) writes:

> Ted Zlatanov writes:
>
>> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:56:53 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen
>> <address@hidden> wrote:  
>>
>> LI> I guess I was just adhering to the `<package>-function' naming
>> LI> convention.  I'm all for renaming it to `list-timers'. 
>>
>> That kind of bugs me about `M-x list-packages' etc. (there's a whole
>> bunch of them, like `list-holidays' and so on). Is there any rule
>> about when to make an exception to the `<package>-function' naming
>> convention?  If not, should there be one? 
>
> I agree. These functions that don't follow the package naming
> convention are always hard to find.

I don't see what's difficult about C-h f list TAB, or apropos.