Re: Generation of tags for the current project on the fly

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> writes:

>> Then I guess we should ask "etags -u" to do that automatically,
>> i.e. for every file name it finds in TAGS to check whether that file
>> exists, and if not, remove all its tags from the file.

Dmitry> Maybe with a new option (e.g. 'etags -u --prune'), because it'll
Dmitry> likely take some time. I wonder how much the overhead is going to be.

One idea would be to detect this situation at M-. time -- that is, when
TAGS tells us about a file that doesn't exist, ignore the bad result and
re-run etags --prune or whatever.

The reason I added --find was to circumvent both this problem (though as
you saw, I didn't actually write this part) and also to deal with a
couple other problems: the need to avoid Makefiles (gcc and gdb have to
be built out-of-tree, which is a pain for running "make tags"), and
consequently the need to have the config be accessible to etags itself.

Tom