Re: comment-filling fixes

[Dave Love]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> I don't think we necessarily need
> to hook directly in the C code.  I think  we just need to take
> font-lock-syntactic-keywords out of font-lock and provide
> a (syntax-update-propeties-upto POS) which elisp can call when it
> needs it.

As there's a general feature for lazy text properties (currently
completely unused as far as I know), why not make it generally useful,
rather than making a special case?