[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:43:50 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>> How about enabling quail-completion on using "TeX" input
>> method as below? I think it's rare to use TAB while editing
>> a TeX/LaTeX file, thus using it for quail-completion is ok
>> while typing some letter.
> I didn't realize that was implemented. It looks helpful, but it
> doesn't do what I'd expect. For instance, if I type `\righta TAB',
> I'd like it to complete to `\rightarrow', like normal completion.
Ah, yes, that is better. But, it requires a non-trivial
change to the current code which should be avoided for the
moment. So, I've just enabled the current way of completion
for "TeX" input method.
> That's a separate issue from being able to complete on Unicode names,
> of course.
Yes. I agree that such an input method is useful. Do you
want to implement it? Otherwise, I'll put that in my todo
list.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, (continued)
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/18
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/16
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx,
Kenichi Handa <=