[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:50:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> And, what to do with the followings? Doesn't babel table
> contain mnemonics for them?
The problem with the Babel ones is that they are somewhat obscure.
For instance, they don't appear in the big compilation of LaTeX
symbols. Of course, it's rather difficult to know or remember the
LaTeX names anyhow... Apart from tabular methods, it would be useful
to have completion on Unicode names, but I didn't get round to
devising an efficient way of doing it with partial completion on the
constituent words of the names. E.g. completion on `quotation' should
allow selection from the set of quotation marks.
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, (continued)
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/18
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/16
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx,
Dave Love <=
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/26