[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacsclient horribly broken
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: emacsclient horribly broken |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:02:14 +0100 |
On 10/31/06, Tim Van Holder <address@hidden> wrote:
Well it was broken, and because Windows was involved "horribly" came to mind :-D
I suspected as much ;)
Follows.
OK. BTW, have you ever signed papers for changes in Emacs? The amount
of patches till now is fine, I think, but more extensive changes would
require signed papers.
-# include <sys/ioctl.h>
+/* FIONBIO can be in either sys/ioctl.h or sys/filio.h */
+# if HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H
+# include <sys/ioctl.h>
+# endif
+# if HAVE_SYS_FILIO_H
+# include <sys/ioctl.h>
+# endif
Shouldn't that last one be "# include <sys/filio.h>"?
-#if !defined (HAVE_SOCKETS)
+#if !defined (HAVE_SOCKETS) || !defined(HAVE_INET_SOCKETS)
So, both are required?
BTW: please send future patches as attached files. I don't like what
Gmail does sometimes to patches included as text in the message.
Thanks a lot for your help,
/L/e/k/t/u
- emacsclient horribly broken, Tim Van Holder, 2006/10/31
- Re: emacsclient horribly broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/31
- Re: emacsclient horribly broken, Jan Djärv, 2006/10/31
- Re: emacsclient horribly broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/31
- Re: emacsclient horribly broken, Kim F. Storm, 2006/10/31
- Re: emacsclient horribly broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/31
- Re: emacsclient horribly broken, Jan Djärv, 2006/10/31
- Re: emacsclient horribly broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/31
- Re: emacsclient horribly broken, Jan Djärv, 2006/10/31