[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:21:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Nick Roberts wrote:
> And I thought we said that CC mode was added to Emacs in 1992, yet e.g
>
> ;;; cc-langs.el --- language specific settings for CC Mode
>
> ;; Copyright (C) 1985, 1987, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
> ;; 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software
> ;; Foundation, Inc.
>
> i.e the years before 1992 are still in the header
Yes, this is fine. Presumably cc-mode was released as a separate
package several times before it was added to Emacs. So in 1992 the
header may have looked like:
1985, 1987, 1992 John Smith
Then when the copyright got assigned to the FSF in 1992, this changes
to become:
1985, 1987, 1992 FSF
The older years do not get removed, you just change the copyright
holder.
> Q. to RMS: What *should* the header for t-mouse.el look like?
>
> Currently:
>
> ;; Copyright (C) 1994,1995 Alessandro Rubini <address@hidden>
> ;; parts are by Ian T Zimmermann <address@hidden>, 1995,1998
> ;; Copyright (C) 2006
> ;; Free Software Foundation, Inc.
If I may answer, then normally you remove the old names and replace
them with FSF, but keep the old dates. So it would look like:
1994, 1995, 1998, 2006 FSF
I suppose there are corner cases when things may be different.
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/01
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/04
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/05
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/11