[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:29:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Nick Roberts wrote:
> > PS Fun times ahead in 3 weeks when every single file in Emacs needs
> > "2007" adding to the Copyright years...
>
> Doesn't this make it a bit silly then to just to do it for 2006?
I'm not just doing it for 2006. I'm clearing up the mess (IMO) that
remains several months after the copyright statements in general were
supposedly all checked. Adding 2007 when the time comes ought to be
almost totally automatic, as you say.
- Re: bad copyright years, (continued)
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/12
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/14