[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:46:13 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.91 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> ps-bdf.el should have all the from 2001 to 2006.
> Do I update the years for AIST as well as FSF?
> I think only those for FSF, but please ask Handa-san.
Long ago, I updated AIST's copyright line to list only such
years that I modified the code. But, AIST keeps copyright
for all continuous years. If we must list all years
explicitely in such a case, could you please update the lines
for AIST too?
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/01
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/04
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/05
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/05
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/11
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09