[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: adieu *scratch*
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: adieu *scratch* |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:05:08 +0100 |
On 12/20/06, Romain Francoise <address@hidden> wrote:
emacs-lock.el seems like a poor man's protbuf.el.
Some shortcomings (most, but not all, fixed in protbuf.el):
- Locking a buffer should be a minor mode.
- There's no emacs-lock entry in minor-mode-alist, so there's no
visual clue in the modeline that a buffer is locked.
- You cannot make it be silent; trying the "locked" action always
triggers an error.
- It uses heuristics for shell and telnet buffers, instead of having
a specific mode for process buffers.
- It uses kill-emacs-hook when kill-emacs-query-functions would be
more logical (and presumably more efficient).
- It has two conceptual flags: don't kill buffer, and don't exit
Emacs, but conflated in a single interface.
- It's documentation is so-so.
/L/e/k/t/u
- adieu *scratch*, Dan Jacobson, 2006/12/12
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/12/19
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Dieter Wilhelm, 2006/12/20
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Romain Francoise, 2006/12/20
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Romain Francoise, 2006/12/20
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: adieu *scratch*,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Dan Jacobson, 2006/12/25
- Re: adieu *scratch*, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/12/20