[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?
From: |
vrtprj.com |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:25:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "John Wiegley" writes:
John Wiegley> Yes, this is also a bug. Good finds! I have them marked to
John Wiegley> be done soon. I'm glad to catch these before inserting into
John Wiegley> Emacs. Any others?
I liked the idea to be able to use Muse for creating DocBook files. However,
the conversion is apparently not so easy. I tried it, and nxml mode marked
some errors in the resulting XML files:
- - "#author X" is converted to "<author>X</author>"
Acoording to the specs this should be
<author><surname/><lastname/>...</author>.
- - the <example/> tag in DocBook needs a <title/> child element and the
contents should be wrapped in <para/> or something else. Maybe the
<literallayout> tag could help to solve this:
<example><title></title><literallayout>...</literallayout></example>. Currently
there is only <example>...</example>.
- - #anchor isn't converted. While the corresponding link [[page#anchor][...]]
is translated to a <ulink/>, the <anchor/> tag doesn't appear
anywhere.
Concerning the author/header: is it planned to add more detail there in future
versions, or should everybody find custom solutions? I'm asking because I
would need some more tags from the DocBook <articleinfo> section...
Rainer
- --
Rainer Volz
Virtuelle Projekte -- www.vrtprj.de
Virtual Projects -- www.vrtprj.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFA1puAenjtlV2FwvQRAp6/AJ47P+MxgHX1jm8S+Z0z1mL8aNpMNgCghXqt
gE+X+JEgpEaIS9n3ue1cLvQ=
=kuoK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, (continued)
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, John Wiegley, 2004/06/18
- muse comments? (was Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, TC, 2004/06/19
- [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, John Wiegley, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, TC, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, John Wiegley, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, TC, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, John Wiegley, 2004/06/20
- [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, Sacha Chua, 2004/06/21
- [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, John Wiegley, 2004/06/21
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?,
vrtprj.com <=
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, Brad Collins, 2004/06/21
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, Tibor Simko, 2004/06/24
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, vrtprj.com, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, TC, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, vrtprj.com, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, TC, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, jorge, 2004/06/21
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, John Wiegley, 2004/06/21
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, TC, 2004/06/21
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, jorge, 2004/06/23