muse comments? (was Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse

[TC]

John,

If folk (e.g. me) are trying out muse and comparing with emacs-wiki, do
you want comments/questions?  If so, to where - is this list OK?

Assuming "yes", and "yes", I'll stumble blindly on with:

1. I set up a project according to your example in the README,
specifying a publishing directory for both html and pdf styles.
But when I then run muse-publish-this-file and specify the style,
it still asks me where I want to publish to, and the default offered is
my source directory, not the publish directory I gave in my .emacs.  Is
that correct?

2.If the "Publish with style:" question is answered with a null (just a
<CR>), the fact that the "Publish to directory" question is then
presented seems to imply that the null style was accepted.  But in fact,
nothing *is* published.  Would it be an idea either to refuse to accept
a null, or to offer a default?

3. An attempt to publish a modified buffer sees the modifications
silently ignored.  emacs-wiki use leads me to expect to at least be
offered the chance to save the buffer first, and either way to have
whatever function I'm running operate on the modified buffer contents,
not on the disk copy.  Dunno if there's anything fundamentally right
about the emacs-wiki approach, but I *think* it's better. 

3. Is there a "muse-publish-all-files-in-this-project" function?

4. README.html doesn't appear to be handling some of the
tags in the source correctly.  For example, in the "Embedded lisp" part
of the "Markup rules" section, you have: 

"Arbitrary kinds of markup can be achieved using the `<lisp>' tag,..."

The "<lisp>" shows up in plaintext and in the .info, but not in the
.html 


cheers,
tc