[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete?
From: |
Sacha Chua |
Subject: |
[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete? |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:25:16 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
johnsu01 <address@hidden> writes:
> I guess I can just track down what changed and change it back, but I
> really don't think it's a good idea to move point by default. I
> still keep accidentally marking the wrong tasks complete, because
> I'm trying to mark 3 tasks in a row, even after a couple of days of
> getting used to the new behavior.
Hmm. Let's see. Excellent point. How should we get around this? I
guess we should revert to the old way of sorting only when we save
files. My planner-tasks-file-behavior is nil, which is why I haven't
been having problems with this. If it's set to non-nil, however,
planner-save-buffers kicks in and saves the current file as well. I
suppose we can suppress saving the current file when we update a task.
Could you please try this patch?
--- orig/planner.el
+++ mod/planner.el
@@ -1713,7 +1715,7 @@
(const :tag "Do nothing" nil)))
(defcustom planner-tasks-never-suppress-fixing-flag t
- "Non-nil means always fix tasks whenever files are saved."
+ "Non-nil means always sort, renumber and align tasks whenever files are
saved."
:group 'planner-tasks
:type 'boolean)
@@ -2078,41 +2080,43 @@
(string= (or (planner-task-date task-a) "")
(or (planner-task-date task-b) ""))))
-(defun planner-save-buffers (&optional buffer-list suppress-fixing)
+(defun planner-save-buffers (&optional buffer-list suppress-fixing skip-buffer)
"Save all planner buffers.
If BUFFER-LIST is a list of buffers, close all buffers not found
in that list. If SUPPRESS-FIXING is non-nil, do not perform any
-planner-related modifications such as task sorting."
+planner-related modifications such as task sorting. If
+SKIP-BUFFER is non-nil, do not save that buffer."
(interactive)
(setq suppress-fixing (and (not planner-tasks-never-suppress-fixing-flag)
suppress-fixing))
(mapcar
(lambda (buffer)
- (with-current-buffer buffer
- ;; Save all planner buffers
- (when (and (planner-derived-mode-p 'planner-mode)
- (planner-page-name))
- ;; SUPPRESS-FIXING is negated in the following forms because
- ;; it makes more sense to let planner-save-buffers do the
- ;; usual actions when the parameter is omitted.
- (let ((planner-sort-tasks-automatically
- (and planner-sort-tasks-automatically
- (not suppress-fixing)))
- (planner-renumber-tasks-automatically
- (and planner-renumber-tasks-automatically
- (not suppress-fixing)))
- (planner-align-tasks-automatically
- (and planner-align-tasks-automatically
- (not suppress-fixing)))
- (planner-renumber-notes-automatically
- (and planner-renumber-notes-automatically
- (not suppress-fixing)))
- (planner-tasks-save-behavior nil))
- (when (buffer-modified-p)
- (save-buffer))))
- (when (and buffer-list
- (not (memq buffer buffer-list)))
- (kill-buffer nil))))
+ (unless (eq buffer skip-buffer)
+ (with-current-buffer buffer
+ ;; Save all planner buffers
+ (when (and (planner-derived-mode-p 'planner-mode)
+ (planner-page-name))
+ ;; SUPPRESS-FIXING is negated in the following forms because
+ ;; it makes more sense to let planner-save-buffers do the
+ ;; usual actions when the parameter is omitted.
+ (let ((planner-sort-tasks-automatically
+ (and planner-sort-tasks-automatically
+ (not suppress-fixing)))
+ (planner-renumber-tasks-automatically
+ (and planner-renumber-tasks-automatically
+ (not suppress-fixing)))
+ (planner-align-tasks-automatically
+ (and planner-align-tasks-automatically
+ (not suppress-fixing)))
+ (planner-renumber-notes-automatically
+ (and planner-renumber-notes-automatically
+ (not suppress-fixing)))
+ (planner-tasks-save-behavior nil))
+ (when (buffer-modified-p)
+ (save-buffer))))
+ (when (and buffer-list
+ (not (memq buffer buffer-list)))
+ (kill-buffer nil)))))
(buffer-list)))
;;;_ + Extraction
@@ -3619,12 +3623,13 @@
(save-restriction
(let ((,live-buffers (and (eq planner-tasks-file-behavior
'close)
- (buffer-list))))
+ (buffer-list)))
+ (current-buffer (current-buffer)))
(prog1
(let ((planner-tasks-file-behavior nil))
,@body)
(when planner-tasks-file-behavior
- (planner-save-buffers ,live-buffers t))))))))
+ (planner-save-buffers ,live-buffers t current-buffer))))))))
;; Manually expanded def-edebug-spec so that we don't have to pull
;; edebug in
--
Sacha Chua <address@hidden> - open source geekette
http://sacha.free.net.ph/ - PGP Key ID: 0xE7FDF77C
interests: emacs, gnu/linux, personal information management, CS ed
sachac on irc.freenode.net#emacs . YM: sachachua83
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] New behavior when marking tasks complete?, (continued)
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] New behavior when marking tasks complete?, Charles philip Chan, 2005/06/29
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] New behavior when marking tasks complete?, johnsu01, 2005/06/29
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] New behavior when marking tasks complete?, Charles philip Chan, 2005/06/29
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] New behavior when marking tasks complete?, johnsu01, 2005/06/29
- [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete?, Sacha Chua, 2005/06/30
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete?, Charles philip Chan, 2005/06/30
- [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete?, Sacha Chua, 2005/06/30
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete?, Peter K . Lee, 2005/06/30
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete?, johnsu01, 2005/06/30
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete?, Paul D. Kraus, 2005/06/30
[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: New behavior when marking tasks complete?,
Sacha Chua <=