Re: [Fab-user] Completed suggestions: prompt (#5, #6)

[Niklas Lindström]

I thought it was your suggestion? :) Anyway, I agree it might be
cleaner with e.g. a 'match' kw (that can take a string *or*
precompiled regexp I suppose)..

And skip the callable-tests for validate (if it's not None, it should
be called). Not the least since we have no "callable" in Python 3..

Any votes on if I should rework it like this?

Best regards,
Niklas



On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Jeff Forcier <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Niklas Lindström <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> == 5. Prompt, repeat and validate ==
>
>> == 6. Prompt, validate with regexp ==
>
> Thumbs up here also. Not sure if having a 'polymorphic' validate
> argument is the cleanest approach (versus making it two, separate
> arguments or something), but that's pretty picky of me :)
>
> -Jeff
>