fgs-bs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fgs-bs] More items


From: tps12
Subject: Re: [Fgs-bs] More items
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:20:05 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Orating has to do with rating? Maybe you should add a "berating" command.

When I thought about match negotiation, I identified three different "levels of specification" as a game went from posted to actually being played. If you're figuring out ratings, then I'll probably just do game negotiation (on the server side) as part of room functionality.

Desired Username wrote:
I started thinking about match negotiation and looking
at the code.  I figured out what I needed to change
when I realized the whole thing has to be done over. The current match nego code works on a p2p basis, if
you will.  Instead we need another global array (heh)
of open game challenges. In the mean time, I'm looking at the ranking mess. Would you believe that there are *six* different
variables here?  srank, rank, ranked, rated, rating,
orating.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]