[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RFA: Ensure All Preprocessor Symbols Defined: Configuration Files
From: |
Jeffrey Oldham |
Subject: |
RFA: Ensure All Preprocessor Symbols Defined: Configuration Files |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:55:28 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
This patch should only be accepted if you approve the previous patch
ensuring preprocessor symbols are defined. This patch reflects the
preprocessor name change of POOMA_BRAIN_DAMAGED_MICROSOFT_LIB to
POOMA_NO_STD_MIN_MAX.
Why are these configuration files present in the Pooma source tree?
If they should be present, OK to commit patch?
If they should not be present, OK to remove the configuration files?
2001-03-28 Jeffrey D. Oldham <address@hidden>
* src/arch/Intel/PoomaConfiguration.Async.h:
s/POOMA_BRAIN_DAMAGED_MICROSOFT_LIB/POOMA_NO_STD_MIN_MAX/g
* src/arch/Intel/PoomaConfiguration.h: Likewise.
* src/arch/Metrowerks/Pooma.prefix.h: Likewise.
Not tested.
Approved by ???you???
Thanks,
Jeffrey D. Oldham
address@hidden
preprocessor-config.patch
Description: Text document
- RFA: Ensure All Preprocessor Symbols Defined: Configuration Files,
Jeffrey Oldham <=