RE: [pooma-dev] RFA: Ensure All Preprocessor Symbols Defined: Configuration Files

[Julian C. Cummings]

Jeffrey,

I'm not sure if anyone ever answered your question
below about configuration files for CW Pro and Intel
VTune.  There is no equivalent of our Unix configure
script for these environments, so we had to create
configuration files manually.  The files get included 
so that all the proper macros are defined.  The 
downside is that someone needs to go edit one of 
these configuration files in order to change something,
like disabling exceptions, for example.

-- Julian C.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Oldham [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:55 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [pooma-dev] RFA: Ensure All Preprocessor Symbols Defined:
Configuration Files


This patch should only be accepted if you approve the previous patch
ensuring preprocessor symbols are defined.  This patch reflects the
preprocessor name change of POOMA_BRAIN_DAMAGED_MICROSOFT_LIB to
POOMA_NO_STD_MIN_MAX.

Why are these configuration files present in the Pooma source tree?
If they should be present, OK to commit patch?
If they should not be present, OK to remove the configuration files?

2001-03-28  Jeffrey D. Oldham  <address@hidden>

        * src/arch/Intel/PoomaConfiguration.Async.h:
        s/POOMA_BRAIN_DAMAGED_MICROSOFT_LIB/POOMA_NO_STD_MIN_MAX/g
        * src/arch/Intel/PoomaConfiguration.h: Likewise.
        * src/arch/Metrowerks/Pooma.prefix.h: Likewise.

Not tested.
Approved by     ???you???

Thanks,
Jeffrey D. Oldham
address@hidden