[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.
|
From: |
Tom Kacvinsky |
|
Subject: |
Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing. |
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:57:06 -0400 (EDT) |
Which fonts are these? If there were such a thing as a Type 1
lint tool (like lint for C), do you think these fonts would pass?
Fontographer generated fonts are notorious for fouling Type 1
rasterisers.
Tom
>
> "type1z" also deals correctly with all the Type 1 fonts I have on
> my disk (except maybe one or two), while "type1" has some problems
> with about 5% of them (about 50 faces)..
>
- type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/01
- FIXED: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/01
- Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Werner LEMBERG, 2000/07/01
- Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., David Turner, 2000/07/01
- Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.,
Tom Kacvinsky <=
- Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Werner LEMBERG, 2000/07/02
- Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.], Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/02
- Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.], David Turner, 2000/07/02
- Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.], Werner LEMBERG, 2000/07/03
- Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.], Angus Duggan, 2000/07/03
- CJK hinting [was: Autohinting concerns], Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/04
- Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstringsprocessing.], David Turner, 2000/07/04