[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.]
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.] |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jul 2000 12:53:24 +0200 (CEST) |
> > My concern has to do with global hints. Glyph hints can probably
> > be safely ignored, but global hints turn on/off overshhoot
> > supression, in addition to giving some information about standard
> > stem widths.
>
> All I can say for now is that it is, for now, possible to use the
> global hints defined in a Type 1 font and pass them to the
> auto-hinter (instead of asking it to recompute them). This is
> limited to the standard width/height + stem snap widths/heights
My interest is (of course) CJK fonts -- Adobe has introduced special
hints (I don't know the names, sorry) to adjust distances and widths
of horizontal stems for such CJK glyphs. Example:
';,, ,;,,,,,,
'' ,;, ,'
,,;' ,,;' ';,
'' ,,,,,,,,,,''' < it is of greatest importance that
;,,,,,,,,; < the widths of these horizontal strokes
;,,,,,,,,; < are equal; similarly, the distances
;,,,,,,,,; < must be equal
,,,' ',,,
I don't know whether this is a global property, but I'm quite sure
that the auto-hinter module will often fail to properly handle this
without hints due to the complexity of CJK glyphs.
Werner
- type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/01
- FIXED: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/01
- Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Werner LEMBERG, 2000/07/01
- Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., David Turner, 2000/07/01
- Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/01
- Re: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing., Werner LEMBERG, 2000/07/02
- Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.], Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/02
- Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.], David Turner, 2000/07/02
- Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.],
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstrings processing.], Angus Duggan, 2000/07/03
- CJK hinting [was: Autohinting concerns], Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/04
- Re: Autohinting concerns [was: type1z vs. type1 charstringsprocessing.], David Turner, 2000/07/04