[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back) |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 08:38:58 +0200 (CEST) |
> Almost perfect* hinting of Tahoma got worse since FreeType 2.3.7 and
> stays that way - please see attached picture (top is good). [...]
I've just had a closer look at this problem, and I can't repeat what
you see! I get the expected result (the top line in your image),
using the current git, compiled with `make devel; make'. Attached is
the (bi-level) result of
ftview -e unic 10 tahoma.ttf
(I have used tahoma version 3.14).
> * Not related to this particular regression: character 'Ł' at 10px -
> one pixel is missing (right side of a stroke).
I can't repeat that either. It looks OK for me.
Werner
- [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Krzysztof Kotlenga, 2009/05/15
- [ft] Re: Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Krzysztof Kotlenga, 2009/05/16
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/16
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back),
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Krzysztof Kotlenga, 2009/05/19
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/22
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Krzysztof Kotlenga, 2009/05/22
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/22
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Antoine Leca, 2009/05/22
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/22