[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back)
From: |
Krzysztof Kotlenga |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back) |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 11:58:01 +0200 |
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> Almost perfect* hinting of Tahoma got worse since FreeType 2.3.7 and
>> stays that way - please see attached picture (top is good). [...]
>
> I've just had a closer look at this problem, and I can't repeat what
> you see! I get the expected result (the top line in your image),
> using the current git, compiled with `make devel; make'. Attached is
> the (bi-level) result of
>
> ftview -e unic 10 tahoma.ttf
Mea culpa, try with size 11. I get results as described previously.
> (I have used tahoma version 3.14).
Same here.
Thanks for taking time to investigate this!
--
Chris
- [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Krzysztof Kotlenga, 2009/05/15
- [ft] Re: Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Krzysztof Kotlenga, 2009/05/16
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/16
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/19
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back),
Krzysztof Kotlenga <=
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/22
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Krzysztof Kotlenga, 2009/05/22
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/22
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Antoine Leca, 2009/05/22
- Re: [ft] Regression (Tahoma strikes back), Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/22