[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fwd: OT? Re: [Fsfe-uk] GPL'ing old versions of code]
From: |
Richard Smedley |
Subject: |
[Fwd: OT? Re: [Fsfe-uk] GPL'ing old versions of code] |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:41:50 +0000 |
Apologies for any duplication, but I originally sent this to the list
at 9:59 and it still hasn't showed up here.
- Richard
Richard Smedley wrote:
>
> Dave Crane wrote:
> >
> > -- Richard Ibbotson wrote: ---
> > The rest of the message is ignored:
> > >
> > > You could produce version 1 and then when you produce version 2 you
> > > could GPL version 1 and give it away ?
> > >
> > --- to which Bob Ham replied: ---
> > > Release a version *without* source? Heresy!
> >
> > Out of idle curiosity, I wondered if this would be allowed under the GPL.
> > Assuming that the v2 code reuses a lot of the internal code from v1, then
> > once v1 is GPL'd, and v2 statically links to it, doesn't the GPL cover v2
> > as well?
>
> The copyright holder may do what she likes with the code and can release
> it under as many different licenses as she desires. Code released under the
> GNU GPL remains under the GNU GPL - however that same code can also be
> released under a proprietary license as well (by the copyright holder) and
> a "closed" development branch started; cf TuxRacer.
>
> I think any proposed accounts package would benefit hugely from being entirely
> under the GNU GPL, due to the confidence that could be engendered by a product
> guaranteed to remain free and supported - for any business that adopted it
> this would be a mission-critical app and closing code would not encourage
> involvement.
>
>
> > There are other ways of making money out of the latest version of course,
> > even if its released with source code e.g. pay for a support package or
> > printed docs or whatever. And withholding the source (which I don't think
> > Richard suggested) would discourage new developers from joining the project.
>
> **Support, support, support**
> Faced with a choice between getting a package for nothing and trusting
> someone in
> their IT dept to tinker with it
> _vs_
> Paying huge amounts of money for a well-supported GPL'd package
>
> *any* manager of a large company would always pay the money.
>
> It's all about accountability - if you'll excuse the pun ;-)
>
>
> > I'm Dave Crane, BTW, java and linux developer/consultant, based in Bristol.
> > Wandered onto this list via the local LUG. Hi.
>
> Hello Dave
>
> - Richard
>
> --
>
> Richard Smedley
> Production Editor, Linux Format
>
> Telephone +44 (0) 1225 442244 ext 5038
--
Richard Smedley
Production Editor, Linux Format
Telephone +44 (0) 1225 442244 ext 5038
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Fwd: OT? Re: [Fsfe-uk] GPL'ing old versions of code],
Richard Smedley <=