|
From: | Andrew Cagney |
Subject: | Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
Date: | Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:58:52 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 |
Elena Zannoni <address@hidden> writes:[tirade deleted] and why oh why didn't you contact the steering committee instead oforganizing your cabal?At the time, the steering committee looked pretty stillborn, and as it hadn't been active in years, it wasn't clear what sort of authority it really had. We were going to float the proposal directly on gdb@, and put the issue in the hands of the people who worked on GDB day to day.
Jim, this is simply not true.As a GDB steering committee member, you should know this so please don't present it as otherwize. RMS raised issues with the GDB steering committee, vis:
- (C) Problems in documentation - miWhich involved signifcant discussion and you yourself even refered this to the committee!
- correct use of "GNU/Linux" - Insight's copyright As GDB's adminstrator, I've been resolving each in turn. Andrew(The last is still on going, and I again remind people that until Red Hat signs relevant paper work)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |