[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
|
Date: |
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 21:44:43 +0200 |
> From: Elena Zannoni <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:29:05 -0500
>
> I was able to contact the steering committee. I am 100% certain that
> if you had chosen to do the same you would have succeeded.
The problem is not to contact the committee, the problem is to get
them to act. As a data point, consider this: until now, unless I'm
mistaken, only one of them took any part in this discussion (apologies
if I missed somebody).
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, (continued)
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/01
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Robert Dewar, 2004/02/01
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Elizabeth Chastain, 2004/02/02
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/02/03
- [Gdbheads] steering committee, David Carlton, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] steering committee, Elena Zannoni, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] steering committee, Michael Snyder, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/02/03
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/02/03
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Elena Zannoni, 2004/02/03