Re: [glob2-devel] glob2 without X

[Brian Cloutier]

Are you asking for a volunteer? I don't have the time necessary to finish the project. But I have some time soon I can use to get the ball rolling if you want. I think the easiest way to approach this would be to separate everything into a libyog, and then add a server binary.

What do you think?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Leo Wandersleb <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi List,

looking at 4 years old version of the entry-point [1] of glob2, it looks to me as if glob2 has never been separated into two binaries - one for client and one for yog.
once when i complained in big surprise that i need to install X on my server to host yog somebody said it has not always been this way but to me it looks like there was a missunderstanding.
Is anybody volunteering to split things so we can scons two binaries? this would definitely help as i have a new server hosting and will not easily be able to argue for installing X on that box. i will not have root any soon there but will get a hudson server for nightly builds running soon.

Regards

Leo Wandersleb

[1] http://hg.globulation2.org/glob2-new/file/602ce6c113de/src/Glob2.cpp


_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel