gnash-commit
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-commit] gnash ChangeLog server/sprite_instance.cpp


From: zou lunkai
Subject: Re: [Gnash-commit] gnash ChangeLog server/sprite_instance.cpp
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:22:25 +0800

> What I meant is you do can call setMask as if it was a TextField
> method...
then confirmed, that's right.  This sentence is clear to me:) Sorry
about the misreading if I did.

--zou

On Jan 8, 2008 4:11 PM, Sandro Santilli <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:00:00PM +0800, zou lunkai wrote:
> > > I belive current GNash renders mask-textfield-6.swf exactly
> > > as shown by the associated .png
> >
> > That's  completely possible, and then probably could pass my test
> > code, since both of them test the same thing(TextField instance as a
> > mask). Forget it if you are already satisfied :)
> >
> > (+       // swfdec/test/image/mask-textfield-6.swf shows that setMask
> > should also
> > +       // work against TextFields)
> >
> > I was just not quite agree with the above docs.  setMask()  still
> > works on sprite instead of TextField instance in that test.  eg:
> > text.setMask(sprite).
>
> Eh... we're both non-english speakers :)
> What I meant is you do can call setMask as if it was a TextField
> method...
>
> >
> > --zou
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]